|
John Bell's experiment on QM explained:
First of all you must be acquainted with Bell's
experiments on
QM :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments
After that a simple explanation of Bell's theorem (1964) should be
understood:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_Theorem
A simple statistical explanation of Bell's inequalities is given in:
Bells Inequalities.pdf
First of all I have to commit that to me the Bell
statistical test of whether QM could be explained with so-called
hidden variables or not, proves with a very high probability that
there are no hidden variables.
And, as explained in my geometrical symmetry
analysis of QFT hidden variables are indeed not present in any
mathematical explanation of QM!
However, any valid SR QM theory, like all
QFT, analysis must comply with Einstein's CAP!
This simple fact implies that all elementary particles must be
described mathematically extended in the 2D-plane orthogonal to the
observed direction of motion. The mathematical, i.e. SR linear,
solution explains why all QM solutions must be solved in complex
Hilbert space, why all elementary particles posses spin, "intrinsic
angular momentum", conserved in the observed direction of motion
(helicity), and why all elementary particles posses energy
proportional to a detected frequency. My description of extended
particles in the 2D-plane orthogonal to the observed direction of
motion does not introduce so-called hidden variables, but explains
spin mathematically.
My mathematical explanation of QFT is a complete
geometrical symmetries analysis, and explains which elementary
particles are possible and necessary in any possible 4D-space-time
universe, and which characteristics all mathematically described
particles have.
And spin is not a so-called "hidden variable", but
a so-called "intrinsic" characteristic of all
QM described
elementary particles, to enable all QM descriptions of physics to
comply to Einstein's CAP. Spinless elementary
particles do NOT comply to the
CAP!
However, up to this day, scientists have no
idea what they are talking about when talking about spin, i.e.
intrinsic angular momentum of a described point-particle! This is
why the majority of all scientists assume a very heavy spinless
Higgs boson will be found at the new
LHC
accelerator in CERN.
Some latest scientific views analyzed at the LHC:
Joseph D. Lykken:
Oliver Buchmuller:
Simeon Hellerman:
Is it SUSY?
The Search for New Physics at the LHC
Unification of String Theories
According to a geometrical symmetry analysis
SUSY is
NOT
possible and any universe always has
4D-spacetime, i.e.
NOT >
4D-spacetime as in all Super String theories!
Last change:
26-02-2011 17:55:58 |